The triumph of the Civil Rights Movement (CRM) during the post ww2 USA is among the most historic victories, a triumph of an oppressed racial minority over a oppressor racial majority that was vastly superior in numbers and political and economic power.
Apart from riots and property destruction the CRM was a relatively bloodless victory. It was a hard won victory, but maybe it wasn't hard enough? Is that possible? Would greater loss of life and greater direct action, greater violence have been more desirable in the long run, even if more costly in the short run? Is the historic legacy of the CRM as the triumph of "non-violence" and "passive resistance" really a poison pill that has done as much harm as good and has emasculated black men?
A bloodless, non violent historic victory left lots of black men with a gnawing feeling they'd been cheated out of something. What was that? What had eluded them? The CRM destroyed historic racial barriers and liberated black men and white women to openly fraternize and white women are heeding nature's call and defecting by the thousands to stronger, more masculine black men away from white weaklings. Fine and well. Black male masculinity is winning the day, naturally, organically and triumphantly as black athletes, actors, businessmen and professionals take center stage from which they were excluded historically. Levers of power are falling to them with increasing speed.
Something is missing. In nature, the strong prevail over the week. The numerous prevail over the few. The victory of the CRM turned all this on its head. Like a mouse eating a cat, the CRM defied history and the rules of the Darwinian world. A bloodier, more costly victory would have been...well more costly in the short run. IN the long run, however, a bloody violent victory even of a minority over a numerical majority as has happened in history, would have imbued black men with stronger senses of self worth, self esteem and replaced the gnawing sense that they'd been cheated. Men are creatures of violence. They fight for women, they fight to save women, to save their own kind, to triuph over enemies. Violence is therapeutic. Violence is good for the male soul. Violence makes men complete. Violence, violent triumph over enemies builds strong men, mentally and physicallyl.
The CRM succeeded because whites were weakened by their own rhetoric against violence, blah, blah, blah. How ironic that people whose historic successes owed so much to their own capacity for violence would suddenly condemn it and renounce it for the sake of some kind of moral principle. Maybe the loss of life in WW2 made whites lose their taste for blood. Who knows?
The point is that deep in the black male psyche is a natural, healthy need for violence, a need to feel the satisfaction of a victory hard won by wiping out the enemy rather than by corruping his morals and tricking him into surrendering. Could it be that the real seed of psychological destruction wrought by the CRM was in its cheapness, bloodless nature? The natural, healthy male appetite for physical violence in black men was left unsatisfied by the feeble collapse of white men in the face of morally superior claims by the CRM. This unsatisfied need is there, it's real, and it's not going away. The CRM is over. It's dead and gone, but its achievements are very real.
What comes next? Well, the changing demographics and the natural attraction of black men to racially defecting white women signals another defeat for white men that potentially is bloodless as the white power dissolves in the wake of the crashing white birth rate. Another bloodless, cheap victory is within the grasp of the black man. History repeating itself. Is this a good thing?
Might not violence, even gratuitous violence, be a desirable pursuit in light of creating psychologically healthy, emotionally complete black men? Will a bloody violent birth of the official BNWO inure to the long term benefit of the new black world? This will be a bloodless victory for black men, but very bloody for white men if history takes this turn and nature takes its traditional course.
Any thoughts? What will be of more benefit to the strong black male: a bloodless victory and white supremacy dying with a whimper instead of a bang, or a big bang and a bloody ending for weakened, powerless white men? Which will contribute more to the long term self esteem and manliness of black men? Does it matter?
Apart from riots and property destruction the CRM was a relatively bloodless victory. It was a hard won victory, but maybe it wasn't hard enough? Is that possible? Would greater loss of life and greater direct action, greater violence have been more desirable in the long run, even if more costly in the short run? Is the historic legacy of the CRM as the triumph of "non-violence" and "passive resistance" really a poison pill that has done as much harm as good and has emasculated black men?
A bloodless, non violent historic victory left lots of black men with a gnawing feeling they'd been cheated out of something. What was that? What had eluded them? The CRM destroyed historic racial barriers and liberated black men and white women to openly fraternize and white women are heeding nature's call and defecting by the thousands to stronger, more masculine black men away from white weaklings. Fine and well. Black male masculinity is winning the day, naturally, organically and triumphantly as black athletes, actors, businessmen and professionals take center stage from which they were excluded historically. Levers of power are falling to them with increasing speed.
Something is missing. In nature, the strong prevail over the week. The numerous prevail over the few. The victory of the CRM turned all this on its head. Like a mouse eating a cat, the CRM defied history and the rules of the Darwinian world. A bloodier, more costly victory would have been...well more costly in the short run. IN the long run, however, a bloody violent victory even of a minority over a numerical majority as has happened in history, would have imbued black men with stronger senses of self worth, self esteem and replaced the gnawing sense that they'd been cheated. Men are creatures of violence. They fight for women, they fight to save women, to save their own kind, to triuph over enemies. Violence is therapeutic. Violence is good for the male soul. Violence makes men complete. Violence, violent triumph over enemies builds strong men, mentally and physicallyl.
The CRM succeeded because whites were weakened by their own rhetoric against violence, blah, blah, blah. How ironic that people whose historic successes owed so much to their own capacity for violence would suddenly condemn it and renounce it for the sake of some kind of moral principle. Maybe the loss of life in WW2 made whites lose their taste for blood. Who knows?
The point is that deep in the black male psyche is a natural, healthy need for violence, a need to feel the satisfaction of a victory hard won by wiping out the enemy rather than by corruping his morals and tricking him into surrendering. Could it be that the real seed of psychological destruction wrought by the CRM was in its cheapness, bloodless nature? The natural, healthy male appetite for physical violence in black men was left unsatisfied by the feeble collapse of white men in the face of morally superior claims by the CRM. This unsatisfied need is there, it's real, and it's not going away. The CRM is over. It's dead and gone, but its achievements are very real.
What comes next? Well, the changing demographics and the natural attraction of black men to racially defecting white women signals another defeat for white men that potentially is bloodless as the white power dissolves in the wake of the crashing white birth rate. Another bloodless, cheap victory is within the grasp of the black man. History repeating itself. Is this a good thing?
Might not violence, even gratuitous violence, be a desirable pursuit in light of creating psychologically healthy, emotionally complete black men? Will a bloody violent birth of the official BNWO inure to the long term benefit of the new black world? This will be a bloodless victory for black men, but very bloody for white men if history takes this turn and nature takes its traditional course.
Any thoughts? What will be of more benefit to the strong black male: a bloodless victory and white supremacy dying with a whimper instead of a bang, or a big bang and a bloody ending for weakened, powerless white men? Which will contribute more to the long term self esteem and manliness of black men? Does it matter?
