Theories:
1. Companies want to expand their consumer base and believe through experience that few people will be put off
2. It’s a hard signal to potential customers that the company is aligned with the system’s policies, is progressive and believes in a diverse future, which these adverts serve to promote and hopefully reduce opposition to multiracialism
3. Ideological leftists (white and non-white) in advertising (probably disproportionately homosexual) enjoy angering and demoralising racists while promoting their vision of a mixed society
4. Advertisements are produced in big cities, which are highly cosmopolitan (London, Paris, New York). People in these areas see diversity as a norm and want to impose it on the less liberal
5. People in advertising may find the BM/WW pairing to be aesthetically stimulating, at least partly because black men are generally seen as being more virile and masculine than white men
6. The pairing is still mildly transgressive and probably gets more attention: BM/WW is very popular in pornography
7. White men don’t need to be encouraged to race mix whereas white women are more inhibited by social barriers, which these advertisements help to break down
8. White men aren't going to prefer black women no matter how much prompting they receive, whereas white women have a much greater potential to prefer black men if given a push
9. Young white women and gay men (who these ads are largely targeted towards economically) are outperforming young heterosexual white men in terms of career success, have more disposable income and support race mixing more strongly
10. If white men are so demoralised that they accept idealized images of their women giving pleasure and children to black men (who 100 years ago were regarded as savages and before that sub-human) at their expense then they will accept any other pairing or policy, which is good for the system
11. It promotes BM/WW sex and that may reduce anti-social behaviour from BM as they feel more sexually satisfied and included in society
1. Companies want to expand their consumer base and believe through experience that few people will be put off
2. It’s a hard signal to potential customers that the company is aligned with the system’s policies, is progressive and believes in a diverse future, which these adverts serve to promote and hopefully reduce opposition to multiracialism
3. Ideological leftists (white and non-white) in advertising (probably disproportionately homosexual) enjoy angering and demoralising racists while promoting their vision of a mixed society
4. Advertisements are produced in big cities, which are highly cosmopolitan (London, Paris, New York). People in these areas see diversity as a norm and want to impose it on the less liberal
5. People in advertising may find the BM/WW pairing to be aesthetically stimulating, at least partly because black men are generally seen as being more virile and masculine than white men
6. The pairing is still mildly transgressive and probably gets more attention: BM/WW is very popular in pornography
7. White men don’t need to be encouraged to race mix whereas white women are more inhibited by social barriers, which these advertisements help to break down
8. White men aren't going to prefer black women no matter how much prompting they receive, whereas white women have a much greater potential to prefer black men if given a push
9. Young white women and gay men (who these ads are largely targeted towards economically) are outperforming young heterosexual white men in terms of career success, have more disposable income and support race mixing more strongly
10. If white men are so demoralised that they accept idealized images of their women giving pleasure and children to black men (who 100 years ago were regarded as savages and before that sub-human) at their expense then they will accept any other pairing or policy, which is good for the system
11. It promotes BM/WW sex and that may reduce anti-social behaviour from BM as they feel more sexually satisfied and included in society