Is interracial porn stuck on the same plots?

[Manueldsdc21]

In a world transversalized by the millions of variables of expenses and preferences, I have been able to notice a common and repetitive pattern ad nauseam in interracial content, they consider that interracial content is mired in the same gender roles and will be condemned to not evolve in something more diverse and inclusive?

avert question: do you think that interracial porn in its different themes is compatible with LGBTQ+ and present the stereotype of the alpha man in other queer variables (example: submissive, homosexual, transsexual, etc.), or should it remain only in that stereotype?

I hope to read your opinions, always remember to respect the ideas of others. thanks for participating.

 

[eligible_cuck]

In my opinion LGBTQI+ is more about rights and equality. Eg the rights of transexuals etc, in the community, in schools, workplaces, etc.

Whereas most IR is about overtly sexualising dark skinned men as prefered fuckers (alpha). Whereas the women in general are sex objects (fuckees). And the cuckolds in general are voyeurs, perverts, and other derogatory kinds. Very rarely are they equal to or superior to the alpha dark skinned man.

Dark skinned women tend to be on a pecking order between dark skinned man and pale skinned women.

There is rarely acknowledgment of reverse stereotypes. Eg submissive dark skinned man in the interracial cuckold or bnwo themes. And yet, of course they exist.

Another fallacy driven by this IR lifestyle is that allegedly dark skinned men all have larger erect dicks, whereas pale skinned men on average have smaller erect dicks.

This is not only untrue for general dark skinned men, but it also ignores average or small erect dicked dark skinned men.

I have posted about this in previous years but because the consumers are generally bi or gay pale skinned men they don't want to hear about it, and would rather keep on the premise that their sex objects (dark skinned men) all have large mentulas. Or they want to pretend that smaller penised dark men don't exist.

Which is proof that exemplary dark skinned men with large penises are sexualised or objectified to appease towards gay and bisexual pale skinned men.

Even myself, when I come here, I'm basically celebrating large dicked dark skinned men.

But at least I don't ignore, and I do know that there are just as many small dicked dark skinned men, and a substantially larger population of average size dick dark skinned men.

 

[Manueldsdc21]

En mi opinión, LGBTQI+ tiene más que ver con derechos e igualdad. Por ejemplo, los derechos de los transexuales, etc., en la comunidad, en las escuelas, en los lugares de trabajo, etc.

Mientras que la mayoría de las relaciones internacionales tratan de sexualizar abiertamente a los hombres de piel oscura como hijos de puta preferidos (alfa). Mientras que las mujeres en general son objetos sexuales (fuckees). Y los cornudos en general son voyeurs, pervertidos y otros tipos despectivos. Muy raramente son iguales o superiores al hombre alfa de piel oscura.

Las mujeres de piel oscura tienden a estar en un orden jerárquico entre los hombres de piel oscura y las mujeres de piel pálida.

Rara vez se reconocen los estereotipos inversos. Por ejemplo, hombre sumiso de piel oscura en el tema cornudo interracial o dos. Y, sin embargo, por supuesto que existen.

Otra falacia impulsada por este estilo de vida de IR es que supuestamente todos los hombres de piel oscura tienen penes erectos más grandes, mientras que los hombres de piel pálida en promedio tienen penes erectos más pequeños.

Esto no sólo es falso para los hombres de piel oscura en general, sino que también ignora a los hombres de piel oscura con pene erecto, promedio o pequeño.

He publicado sobre esto en años anteriores, pero debido a que los consumidores son generalmente hombres bisexuales o homosexuales de piel pálida, no quieren oír hablar de ello y prefieren seguir con la premisa de que todos sus objetos sexuales (hombres de piel oscura) tienen mentulas grandes. O quieren fingir que los hombres morenos con penes más pequeños no existen.

Lo cual es una prueba de que los hombres ejemplares de piel oscura con penes grandes son sexualizados u objetivados para apaciguar a los hombres homosexuales y bisexuales de piel pálida.

Incluso yo, cuando vengo aquí, básicamente estoy celebrando a los hombres de piel oscura y penes grandes.

Pero al menos no lo ignoro, y sí sé, que hay la misma cantidad de hombres con penes pequeños y una población sustancialmente mayor de hombres de piel oscura y con penes de tamaño promedio.

In my opinion LGBTQI+ is more about rights and equality. Eg the rights of transexuals etc, in the community, in schools, workplaces, etc.

Whereas most IR is about overtly sexualising dark skinned men as prefered fuckers (alpha). Whereas the women in general are sex objects (fuckees). And the cuckolds in general are voyeurs, perverts, and other derogatory kinds. Very rarely are they equal to or superior to the alpha dark skinned man.

Dark skinned women tend to be on a pecking order between dark skinned man and pale skinned women.

There is rarely acknowledgment of reverse stereotypes. Eg submissive dark skinned man in the interracial cuckold or bnwo themes. And yet, of course they exist.

Another fallacy driven by this IR lifestyle is that allegedly dark skinned men all have larger erect dicks, whereas pale skinned men on average have smaller erect dicks.

This is not only untrue for general dark skinned men, but it also ignores average or small erect dicked dark skinned men.

I have posted about this in previous years but because the consumers are generally bi or gay pale skinned men they don't want to hear about it, and would rather keep on the premise that their sex objects (dark skinned men) all have large mentulas. Or they want to pretend that smaller penised dark men don't exist.

Which is proof that exemplary dark skinned men with large penises are sexualised or objectified to appease towards gay and bisexual pale skinned men.

Even myself, when I come here, I'm basically celebrating large dicked dark skinned men.

But at least I don't ignore, and I do know that there are just as many small dicked men, and a substantially larger population of average size dick dark skinned men.

Excellent observation, of course I use the acronym LGBTQ+ not as claims of rights, but to summarize the current situation in sexual fetishes related to diverse sexuality. As a homosexual man, I direct my content to my own tastes and preferences. On the other hand, regarding the clichés of the alpha black man and the white beta man, I agree with you, it is a typical one that mostly seems to be simply demanded by a consumer, but what if this is so because the content creators simply do not have Enough creativity to consider new topics? What if instead of presenting the typical relationships in interracial stories, be they cuckolds or diverse sexuality (LGBTQ+ NSFW content), they are inhibited from doing so by taboos such as racism? The majority of authors in these forums are Anglo-Saxon and/or African American, burdened with social defects as a result of their history that has shaped their current idiosyncrasy. For me that is something foreign because being Hispanic (South America) we do not suffer from these defects and It is even normal for us to consume content where an effeminate black man is the bottom of a relationship or vice versa, that is, we generally do not make a distinction based on skin color, there is also the cliché of a black man with an elephant penis, but it is a typical topic of American porn that is also consumed, do you think that presenting stories where those roles are reversed in stronger fetishes such as BNWO or VWD presented from an inverse perspective are considered pornographic fetishes or are treated as pamphlets of racial hatred, If so, why aren't the aforementioned topics treated like this as well?

 

[Manueldsdc21]

I attach two images with the reverse stereotypes, a black boy (very cute by the way) with an average cock, and another white boy (also very cute) with an elephant cock. I think that perhaps in the world of porn and the creation of ferichistic content (which large production companies would not dare to produce) we have allowed it to become intoxicated by politics and problems of reality, which is why I have tried to evade reality in the fantasies that we consume. ?

 

[Manueldsdc21]

 

[Manueldsdc21]

In my opinion LGBTQI+ is more about rights and equality. Eg the rights of transexuals etc, in the community, in schools, workplaces, etc.

Whereas most IR is about overtly sexualising dark skinned men as prefered fuckers (alpha). Whereas the women in general are sex objects (fuckees). And the cuckolds in general are voyeurs, perverts, and other derogatory kinds. Very rarely are they equal to or superior to the alpha dark skinned man.

Dark skinned women tend to be on a pecking order between dark skinned man and pale skinned women.

There is rarely acknowledgment of reverse stereotypes. Eg submissive dark skinned man in the interracial cuckold or bnwo themes. And yet, of course they exist.

Another fallacy driven by this IR lifestyle is that allegedly dark skinned men all have larger erect dicks, whereas pale skinned men on average have smaller erect dicks.

This is not only untrue for general dark skinned men, but it also ignores average or small erect dicked dark skinned men.

I have posted about this in previous years but because the consumers are generally bi or gay pale skinned men they don't want to hear about it, and would rather keep on the premise that their sex objects (dark skinned men) all have large mentulas. Or they want to pretend that smaller penised dark men don't exist.

Which is proof that exemplary dark skinned men with large penises are sexualised or objectified to appease towards gay and bisexual pale skinned men.

Even myself, when I come here, I'm basically celebrating large dicked dark skinned men.

But at least I don't ignore, and I do know that there are just as many small dicked men, and a substantially larger population of average size dick dark skinned men.

I invite you to see my content, and I ask you this question, do you think that if I would consider doing the same but in reverse, how would it be received? as ferichist content or hate pamphlet?

 

[eligible_cuck]

I invite you to see my content, and I ask you this question, do you think that if I would consider doing the same but in reverse, how would it be received? as ferichist content or hate pamphlet?

I can only answer my viewpoint of course.

First of all I forgot the biggest issue with US & let's say UK porn. The dichotomisation of people into two fictional 'races' of blacks and whites. This is a gross oversimplification!

People in the real world do not exist with skin tones of blacks so black that no light or reflection of light comes from their skin.

In reality their skin tones vary from mild brown to very dark brown, but no actual real blacks.

And often their hair colour is often darker than their skin colour. Unless they're old like me and their hair colour is going grey, or even white, or they've become completely bald.

Ditto with 'whites' as people with real 'white' skin do not exist.

Even Albino's and Vitiligo's skin is not pure white. It is some shade of very light milk colour (cream?) and not white enough to be white.

Note that albino and Vitiligo's of course exist amongst dark skinned Africans too. In fact some are celebrated but the vast majority of them are shunned, or vilified. Or they're badly hurt or killed and their mothers are accused of cheating. Neither of which is true. But human nature is what human nature is.

There was a photo of a beautiful African young lady standing next to Queen Elizabeth for example.

And of the men, again of course, skin colour in reality has zero correlation with penis size. They can be blessed with very large penises, or very small penises, but often with an average sized penis. In short there is NO CORRELATION BETWEEN PENIS SIZE AND SKIN TONE.

But equally the desire to celebrate and expect and believe dark skinned men with large penises is strong and that is the mantra that is supported and believed by the gay or bisexual pale skinned men. In general.

Their are of course exceptions.

 

[eligible_cuck]

It should also be stated that the term 'race' does not exist in human biological taxa. Or taxonomy.

In biological taxonomy there is ******, species, and for humans no subspecies. Though if Denisovians and Neanderthals existed amongst us today we may have had sub-species.

But still no 'race', because race is not a scientific term.

Race is actually a geo political term. It may also be used psychologically, and definitely historical term. But NOT scientific.

Why not scientific? Because when you consider that apes are only 4% different than humans then skin tone doesn't even make 1%.

And penis size isn't even in the picture. Yet that is what the gay and bisexual community focus on. So it cannot be ignored.

 

[eligible_cuck]

It's nearly 6 am here and I want to get some more sleep then do my other chores and if I have time I will respond to your other points.

Thank you and write to you later.

 

[Manueldsdc21]

Son casi las 6 am aquí y quiero dormir un poco más, luego hacer mis otras tareas y si tengo tiempo responderé a tus otros puntos.

Gracias y te escribo más tarde.

It's nearly 6 am here and I want to get some more sleep then do my other chores and if I have time I will respond to your other points.

Thank you and write to you later.

I truly share your assessments, so would it be too groundbreaking, sacrilegious to consider making content with the same topics of interracial porn but in reverse, especially on topics like BNWO or VWD?