Translation: I quite agree, but I would prefer to say (in my opinion more precisely) that white people do not attach sexual labels to themselves, but rather black masters give them sexual labels, according to their taste and pleasure: for example, they might decide to feminize one adolescent white male and not feminize another.
Reply: Since this is all new to me, I’m beginning to understand the lifestyle BNWO is creating.
I’d agree that as white boys transitions from their old life to a new life as a slave, many identifiers no longer apply.
As you suggested, self identification is no longer necessary, and since serving black masters will equate to essentially becoming a “free use” slave with no control on how their bodies are utilized, labels like straight, gay, bi, are irrelevant.
I don’t think being feminized or not being feminized has any bearing on labels like straight, gay, bi. The entire concept is no longer relevant to slaves.
Would you label a blow up doll as straight, gay, bi? Of course not. Because a doll is an object.
Similarly as white boy slaves, we essentially are objects and tools for BNWO, to be used, abused, humiliated, or manipulated.